2020年5月9号亚太雅思大作文网上获取的信息不准确高分范文分享！

　　2020年5月9号亚太雅思大作文网上获取的信息不准确高分范文：

　　The utterance in the claim made by the topic is groundless because of the difficulty in quantifying "most of what we read" and the vagueness of the word "inaccuracy".

图片来源网络

　　To assess whether most of what we read online is inaccurate or not, one must first provide a credible measurement of the relevant figures. Sadly, the expression in the rubric can hardly fulfill this requirement. We cannot find any persuasive criterion to evaluate the so-called "most" in the prompt; the same holds for the other words and phrases. In daily expression, it is understandable that people may exaggerate their feelings about the internet littered with information, most of which may be posted by individuals and not that accurate because of, say, the subjectivity of the authors. However, once the expression becomes a statement, facing the logical scrutiny, it is no longer reasonable. Just what proportion of what we read can be considered "most"? There is certainly no credible answer related to this. What is more, it is still hard for us to provide a precise sample size to make "most of what we read" sound quantifiable: we cannot figure out the total information content we have got from the internet; it is too much and fragmented.

　　We also face a similar situation when we start to evaluate the word "inaccurate". The universal definition of inaccuracy is something that is not true enough, but in that case, there would be no information that can be deemed "accurate" in the real world. Everything we learn from either book or other platforms is only correct within limits like, say, when the statement is made, the period of validity, and the scope of application. It is therefore irresponsible to recklessly give out the judgment of whether the information is accurate or not without attaching any condition or premise to make it work. That means, even though what we get from the internet may not be that correct when facing certain verification, it still cannot be deemed inaccurate when we haven't made a well-rounded analysis. For some information, there would always be cases in which it withstands the test of reality.

　　In conclusion, the vagueness of certain words and phrases in the claim that most of what we read online is inaccurate compels me to question the accuracy of it; one has to set clear criteria about the quantifications and to provide related conditions before making the judgment.

　　相关词汇和语法结构

　　Groundless 站不住脚

　　Rubric 题干

　　Period of validity 有效期